It's common for millennials in Nevada and elsewhere in the nation to have a desire to keep things simple, even when it comes to estate planning. They often prefer assets that suit their portable lifestyles. Younger adults also tend to gravitate towards simple documents like wills.
Those who live in Nevada or anywhere else may no longer have a close relationship with a child or other family member. In some cases, an individual may want to exclude that family member from an estate plan. If it becomes necessary to fully or partially disinherit someone, it is generally better to do so with a living trust. This is because a trust is harder to challenge than a will.
Trusts can be powerful instruments when they are included in Nevada estate plans. They can be tailored to fit the circumstances and wishes of the trustmaker, and they can effect the transfer of assets outside of probate. Broadly speaking, the two categories of trusts are revocable trusts and irrevocable trusts. An irrevocable trust cannot be altered once it is made, while revocable trusts can be changed by the trustmaker after they are established.
People in Nevada spend more time online than ever before, and an increasing portion of their financial lives are also conducted over the internet. However, many individuals do not think about digital assets when they begin to consider planning for the future. When people make a will, they think about their real estate, jewelry, bank accounts or investment funds, but they may not consider the digital elements of their assets. However, this is an increasingly important part of a modern estate plan that can affect how effectively assets transfer to beneficiaries after death.
People in Nevada could learn from the estate planning woes currently being experienced by the family of the late Aretha Franklin. Initially, reports were that the singer, who died in 2018, did not have a will. Since then, three different wills have been found. All three wills were handwritten, and all have been submitted to the court. It is unclear whether the court will consider any of them valid.
While estate planning is important for all adults in Nevada, it is critical to do so properly. A common mistake that people make is to leave assets directly to minors. A better idea is to leave the asset to a trust that a minor child or grandchild is the beneficiary of. If a trust is created, it needs to be funded before its creator passes on. Otherwise, assets that were intended for the trust may still need to go though probate.
In Las Vegas, Nevada, the distribution of property is often part of a detailed estate plan. Although some people detest the thought of establishing estate plans, sound financial planning regarding estates can offer peace of mind. Some people avoid thinking about inheritance issues because of superstitious beliefs. These superstitious individuals believe that making their wills may cause bad luck or even death. The fact is that people eventually die regardless of whether they have wills or estate plans.
Some people in Nevada are ardent do-it-yourselfers when it comes to everything from household tasks to taxes. But a DIY approach to preparing a will could contribute to some oversights or missteps that may be problematic for loved ones left behind. One potential problem is that some sites may omit important companion documents, such as a financial power of attorney and an advance healthcare directive, or only offer them with higher-priced packages.
People in Nevada who have remarried but have children from a previous marriage need to take steps to ensure that both their spouse and children are taken care of in the estate plan. A simple will is usually not sufficient in these situations. If a person leaves everything to the spouse, that spouse may leave nothing to the children.
People inheriting various assets in Nevada could enjoy certain tax advantages due to the concept known as step-up in cost basis. This term refers to an asset's increase in value while someone possesses it. A person who buys a stock for $2 a share and then sells it while still alive for $10 a share would owe capital gains taxes on the $8 per share increase in value.